FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save
  • Email
  • Print

1.15.2026 Availability of UM Criteria: Documentation and Look-Back Period for 2026 Surveys For 2026 surveys, will NCQA accept an implementation plan for making UM criteria available at the point of care, and will NCQA shorten the look-back period for making UM criteria available at the point of care?

Yes. For the 2026 standard year only (surveys conducted between July 1, 2026, and June 30, 2027), NCQA will allow organizations to submit a detailed implementation plan.

The plan must include: 

  • A description of actions to make UM criteria available electronically at the point of care.
  • A timeline for implementation on or before June 30, 2027.

Look-Back Period: Effective immediately, the look-back period for the entire Element B for First Surveys and Renewal Surveys has changed from six months to “prior to the survey date.” 

This approach provides flexibility and additional time for organizations to meet requirements.

Applicable Standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 2, Element B.
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 2, Element B.
  • UM Accreditation: UM 4, Element B.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

1.15.2026 Tobacco Use Screening and Cessation Intervention (TSC-E) for 11-Year Olds Does tobacco cessation counseling provided to a person 11 years of age count towards numerator 2?

Yes, if a person in denominator 2 is 12 years of age at the start of the measurement period and received tobacco cessation counseling within the 180 days prior to the measurement period at 11 years of age, this person is compliant for numerator 2.

This clarification will be included in the HEDIS Volume 2 MY 2026 Technical Update, scheduled for release on March 31, 2026.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS MY 2026

1.15.2026 Tobacco Use Screening and Cessation Intervention (TSC-E) for 17-Year Olds Does pharmacotherapy intervention provided to a person 17 years of age or younger at the time of the dispensing event count towards numerator 2?

No, pharmacotherapy interventions provided to persons aged 17 years and younger at the time of the dispensing event do not count towards numerator 2 because there are no current FDA-approved tobacco cessation medications for persons under 18 years of age. If a person in denominator 2 is 18 years of age at the start of the measurement period and received pharmacotherapy interventions within the 180 days prior to the measurement period at 17 years of age, this person is not compliant with numerator 2.  

This clarification will be included in the HEDIS Volume 2 MY 2026 Technical Update, scheduled for release on March 31, 2026.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS MY 2026

1.15.2026 Use of C-CDA documents from a Health Information Exchange Can C-CDA documentation, such as a Continuity of Care Documents (CCD), from a Health Information Exchange (HIE) be used as proof-of-service or medical record review abstraction?

No. C-CDA documents cannot be used for these purposes as the documents are electronically generated and not the same as the medical record documented in the primary source system where care was originally recorded (e.g. electronic medical record). This includes C-CDA documents received from HIEs.

HIEs support the exchange of clinical information, an important function for the delivery of care. Organizations are encouraged to use electronic files received from an HIE, such as electronic C-CDA or FHIR documents (e.g., C-CDA XML, FHIR JSON), as a supplemental data source.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HEDIS MY 2026

1.15.2026 Including Delegate Data in UM Denial and Appeal Rate Calculations Should UM delegate rates be included in the denial and appeal rates reported for UM rate calculations?

Yes. Data from UM delegates must be included in the UM denial and appeal rates reported for UM 1, Elements B-E (in Health Plan Accreditation). The intent of reporting the rates for these elements is to provide a comprehensive view of the organization’s UM denial and appeal rates. Therefore, the expectation is that the organization presents all rates in a single workbook, rather than separating requests received by the organization (e.g., health plan) and those received by the delegate.

Applicable standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation: UM 1, Elements B-E. 
  • Behavioral Health Accreditation: UM 1, Elements B-D.
  • Utilization Management Accreditation: UM 3, Elements B-E.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2026|UM 2026|BHA 2026

1.15.2026 Automated documentation of dates in PHM 5, Element D PHM 5, Element D states: “The automated case management system must document the dates associated with entries for factors 1–12.” Does NCQA score automated documentation of dates in PHM 5, Element D?

Yes. The statement in Element D clarifies that the system must document the date when the case manager completes each component of the initial assessment.   

  • If all components are completed at one time, one date is sufficient.
  • If components are completed at different times, the system must automatically capture the date associated with each factor in Element D. In this scenario, the organization will be scored down for any factor that does not have an automated date.

Applicable standards:

  • Health Plan Accreditation: PHM 5, Element D

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
HP 2025, 2026

1.12.2026 Health Plan Ratings Historical Data Where can I access prior year HPR scores or retrospective HPR data?

NCQA currently maintains prior year HPR scores on NCQA’s HPR Final Results website.

You can also purchase the Health Plan Ratings in Excel Format file which lists plan’s overall rating, composite, subcomposite and measure-level scores from the NCQA store

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

1.12.2026 What is the threshold for AR-KM 3: Medication Reconciliation (AR 2026)?

For AR-KM 3 (2026 Annual Reporting) the threshold will remain at more than 80% with the intent that practices will begin implementing updated workflows to be able to reach more than 90% by Annual Reporting in 2027.

We have made a notation of this expectation in the 2026 PCMH Annual Reporting publication to ensure practices understand the expectation for future Annual Reporting years.

For PCMH, a transition of care is defined as: A patient’s movement from one care setting (e.g., hospital, ambulatory primary care practice, ambulatory specialty care practice, long-term care, home health, rehabilitation facility) to another. That said, medication review and reconciliation should occur at transitions of care, or at least annually. If a patient has experienced multiple transitions of care within the reporting period (e.g. hospital discharge, post cardiology visit, hospital discharge, post gastroenterology visit) they should be counted in the denominator for each transition of care.
 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:
PCMH 2017

1.08.2026 RDM Measure Scoring in Health Plan Ratings How is the RDM measure scored?

NCQA will give organizations credit (an individual measure rating of “5”) if both reported Direct Race and Direct Ethnicity is ≥20%. Organizations that do not report Direct Race and Direct Ethnicity ≥20% will receive an individual measure rating of “0”. The measure has a weight of 1.0. 

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

1.08.2026 Deriving Measure Ratings From National Benchmarks How does NCQA derive measure ratings?

To calculate individual measure scores, NCQA truncates final raw rates and percentiles to 3 decimals and compares the rates submitted by plans to The National All Lines of Business 10th, 33.33rd, 66.67th and 90th measure benchmarks and percentiles, and then assigns the individual measure rating (calculated as whole numbers on a 1–5 scale) that the plans receive for each measure as follows:

5 = plans with a rate ≥ 90th percentile (top 10% of plans)

4 = plans in the top third but not in the top decile (66.67th percentile ≤ rate < 90th percentile)

3 = the middle one-third of plans or (33.33rd percentile ≤ rate < 66.67th percentile)

2 = plans above the bottom 10% of plans but in the bottom one-third of plans (10th percentile ≤ rate < 33.33rd percentile)

1 = plans with a rate < 10th percentile (in the bottom 10% of plans)

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

1.08.2026 Reviewing Projected Ratings My plan received an overall rating status of Partial Data Reported, No Data Reported, or Low Enrollment. Do I still need to review our projected rating?

Yes. Plans that are non-numerically rated (Partial Data Reported, No Data Reported, Low Enrollment) still need to review all other plan-related information (e.g., Legal Name, State Coverage, NCQA Accreditation status) to ensure its accuracy.

This applies to the following Programs and Years:

1.08.2026 LDM Measure Scoring in Health Plan Ratings How is the LDM measure scored?

NCQA will give organizations credit (an individual measure rating of “5”) if the reported “Total Known” Preferred Written Language and “Total Known” Preferred Spoken Language is ≥20%. Organizations that do not report “Total Known” Preferred Written Language and “Total Known” Preferred Spoken Language ≥20% will receive an individual measure rating of “0”. The measure has a weight of 1.0.

This applies to the following Programs and Years: