FAQ Directory

Yes. We sent communication to plans, auditors, vendors, physician groups, purchaser groups and state and federal agencies.

HEDIS 2013

For HEDIS 2013, NCQA will adopt a new audit process that uses like-measure groupings for measure validation, includes hybrid measure exclusions, applies a different statistical test to the process and clearly defines MRR milestones to ensure consistency across plans.

HEDIS 2013

Although NCQA does not anticipate that rates will decrease, plans will need to start early and collect all data by May 15 to ensure that their rates are not affected.

HEDIS 2013

A member who cannot be located or communicated with after three or more attempts over a 2-week period may be excluded from complex case management, and the file may be excluded from review. The organization must document attempts to contact the member by various mechanisms (telephone, letter, e-mail or fax) and through authorized caregiver channels.

No. If a member does not have creditable coverage, or does not have enough coverage to offset the entire pre-existing condition exclusionary period, the denial is not considered a medical necessity determination and should not be included in the UM denial file review. However, the denial may be appealed, and should be included in the appeal file review.

No. A fill date from the previous measurement year is not included in current measurement year calculations. The text on page 180 of the MY 2011 P4P publication, under Index prescription date (IPD), should read [the IPD is the] first fill date during the measurement year. The member in your example is ineligible because the first fill date does not occur in the current measurement year.

No. With the exception of ABMS or AOA sponsored boards, NCQA requires organizations to determine and list specialty boards they accept within their credentialing policies and procedures. At a minimum, at least annually, organizations must obtain written confirmation from the specialty board that it performs primary-source verification of education and training. A specialty board that provides annual written confirmation that it conducts primary source verification of education and training can be used as an acceptable source for verification of education and training if the organization names the specialty board in its policies and procedures.

The organization must verify board certification status for any practitioner claiming to be certified by an ABMS or AOA sponsored boards, or by a specialty board recognized by the organization.

"Culturally and linguistically" appropriate refers to the organization providing notices of the appeal process to non-English-speaking members, in languages appropriate to members.

Yes. An organization may use its bylaws to meet the credentialing policies and procedures if the bylaws include all credentialing requirements of the element.

Yes. E-mailed correspondence suffices as written acknowledgment if it adequately outlines the delegated responsibilities of the certified organization.

No. The denial notice does not need to include notification that a new, nonsubordinate reviewer will be appointed; however, the organization must include this requirement in its appeal policies and procedures to meet UM 8, Elements B and C, factor 5, and include it in applicable appeal files to meet UM 9, Element C.

No. With the exception of ABMS or AOA sponsored boards, NCQA requires organizations to determine and list specialty boards they accept within their credentialing policies and procedures. At a minimum, at least annually, organizations must obtain written confirmation from the specialty board that it performs primary-source verification of education and training. A specialty board that provides annual written confirmation that it conducts primary source verification of education and training can be used as an acceptable source for verification of education and training if the organization names the specialty board in its policies and procedures.