Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can ask a question through My NCQA.
Because of the complexities of the workbook formulas, we are unable to change the workbook to accept “NA” in time for 2019 Standards Year surveys. To correctly calculate the notification date scoring, a date must be entered in this field.
NCQA will not require organizations to provide documentation of the decision date and will instruct surveyors to enter the earliest of
Regardless of the score calculated for decision date,
HP 2019
The evidence must specifically reflect the practice’s patient population. Standalone practices whose PFAC only includes patients and family members from the practice may use it to meet QI 04B. For practices that are a part of an organization with other primary care practices under the same umbrella, a shared PFAC would not meet QI 04B. While an organization with a shared PFAC in most cases cannot use it as evidence for QI 04B, it may be used it to demonstrate shared evidence to meet elective criteria TC 04 (2 credits) and QI 17 (2 credits).
PCMH 2017
No, increasing survey response rate is important in obtaining more representative patient feedback, but would not meet the intent of QI 08 or AR QI 03. The response rate is part of the platform for obtaining the feedback, while the measure for these criteria should be improving the feedback itself.
PCMH 2017
No, neither secure, electronic fax noR secure email would meet the intent of CM 09. For CM 09, the practice must demonstrate its capability to make their patient's care plans available securely to other care settings, such as hospitals, specialists, or other care facilities that could be managing patient care. This availability should be at the time the patient is seen, including after hours, and as such should not involve reaching out to the practice for the information to be sent. The way in which this care plan is shared may vary and NCQA is not prescriptive, but examples include sharing care plans via shared medical records, HIEs or other shared systems that enable staff from different care settings to view the patient's care plan for continuity and optimal care coordination while the patient receives care from multiple settings.
PCMH 2017
For care coordination, the intent of QI 02A is to evaluate the communication/coordination that occurs between providers or providers and patients, so it's generally looking at closing the loop on care coordination tasks/processes. Some examples for care coordination may include but are not limited to:
– Reduced % of patients seeing multiple providers (3 or more)
– Medication reconciliation after care transition (MU)
– Follow up with patients or providers to ensure ordered lab or imaging tests were completed
– Follow up with patients following receipt of abnormal test results
– Outreach to patients not recently seen that result in an appointment
– Follow-up phone calls to check on the patient after an ER visit (or hospitalization)
– # patient calls received after hours by the call center were reconciled in the patient record and addressed by the care team the next business day
– Following up on pediatric visits to after-hours care
– Number of referrals sent
– % of patients who had a positive TB screen who had a FU Chest x-ray
– % of patients who had a positive GC/Chlamydia who were treated with antibiotics
The intent of QI 02B is for practices to use measures to help them understand how efficiently they're providing care and judiciously using resources. Examples of measures affecting health care costs may include but are not limited to:
– Total cost per patient
– Medical cost per medical visit
– # of medications prescribed
– Use of high cost medications
– Use of imaging for low back pain
– Redundant imaging or lab tests
– Emergency department utilization
– Hospital readmission rates
– Use of generic versus brand name medication
– # of Specialist referrals
– # of patients who went to urgent care during open office hours
– # of referrals/ED visits for needs that could be addressed in the office
– Appropriate testing for children with pharyngitis
– Appropriate treatment for children with URI
PCMH 2017
Except for plans in Puerto Rico, which report all members in the “Unknown” category, it is expected that the member count in this category will be fewer than 10. Plans should determine why members are reported as “Unknown” and be able to explain the reason to their auditor.
This category should not be used for members who are disenrolled for the 2019 calendar year and consequently have no record in the December 2018 Monthly Membership Detail File. Use the October and November files for these members.
HEDIS 2019
General Guideline 25 in HEDIS Volume 2 explains that benefits are not assessed at the service level. Assessment of benefits must follow the measure specifications under the Benefit section of the Eligible Population criteria. Organizations may not assess benefits at a service level for an NB (No Benefit) audit designation.
For example:
· If the organization offers a pharmacy benefit but does not cover a specific medication class, the member has a pharmacy benefit and is included in the applicable measures requiring this benefit.
· If the organization offers a mental health benefit but does not cover inpatient visits, the member has a mental health benefit and is included in the applicable measures requiring this benefit, unless the measure benefit requires inpatient care, per the Eligible Population benefit requirements (e.g., Follow-up After Hospitalization for Mental Illness requires both inpatient and outpatient mental health coverage).
HEDIS 2019
The organization does not need to have value-based payments for every month of the look-back period. It reports:
For example, the denominator is 12 months of all payments, but if there are 3 months of value-based payments in the look-back period, the numerator is the 3 months of value-based payments.
HP 2019
