FAQ Directory

Here are some of the most frequently asked questions about NCQA’s various programs. If you don’t see what you are looking for in one of the entries below, you can  ask a question through My NCQA.

Filter Results
  • Save

    Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.

    You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.

  • Email

    Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.

    We do not share your information with third parties.

  • Print

    Print this page.

6.14.2024 RxNorm codes for Asthma Medication Ratio (AMR) Can RxNorm codes be used when identifying the required exclusion for members who had no asthma controller or reliever medications dispensed during the measurement year?

No. Although the Asthma Controller and Reliever Medication List includes RxNorm codes, they should not be used to identify dispensing events for this required exclusion. Only use pharmacy data (NDC codes) when assessing asthma controller or reliever medication dispensing events for this required exclusion. Because a dispensing event is required to calculate the numerator, members who had no dispensing events should be removed from the measure.

HEDIS 2024

5.21.2024 Inpatient Stay Value Set for Emergency Department Visits for Hypoglycemia in Older Adults with Diabetes (EDH) The HEDIS MY 2024 Value Set Directory (VSD) states that the Inpatient Stay Value Set was deleted from the EDH measure. Please clarify if it should be used for risk adjustment.

Yes, as described in the Guidelines for Risk Adjusted Utilization Measures, organizations must use the Inpatient Stay Value Set for the risk adjustment comorbidity category determination (use the Inpatient Stay Value Set to identify acute and nonacute inpatient discharges with a discharge date during the classification period). The value set was mistakenly deleted from the EDH measure in the VSD. Because the guidelines clearly state that the value set must be used, NCQA does not intend to reissue the VSD.

HEDIS 2024

5.15.2024 Depression screening instrument table for Depression Screening and Follow-Up for Adolescents and Adults (DSF-E) Should the Depression Screening and Follow-Up for Adolescents and Adults (DSF-E) measure in the Depression screening instrument table for the Adolescents (≤17 years), Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS)® LOINC Code be updated?

Yes, replace Total Score LOINC Code “55758-7” with “89208-3” in the Depression screening instrument table for the Instruments for Adolescents (≤17 years), Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS)®.

Exchange 2024

5.15.2024 Direct reference code 76689-9 for Cervical Cancer Screening (CCS) LOINC code 76689-9 is included in the CCS measure specification but was deleted from CCS in the Value Set Directory (VSD). Please clarify if the code should be used when reporting Cervical Cancer Screening for MY 2024.

Yes, as described in the Required exclusions section of the CCS measure, use LOINC code 76689-9 to exclude members with a sex assigned at birth of male any time in the patient’s history. The code was mistakenly removed from the CCS measure in the 4-1-2024 release of the VSD (Direct Reference Code spreadsheet). Because the information needed for reporting is in the measure specification NCQA does not intend to reissue the VSD.

Exchange 2024

5.15.2024 Direct reference code 76689-9 for Cervical Cancer Screening (CCS) LOINC code 76689-9 is included in the CCS measure specification but was deleted from CCS in the Value Set Directory (VSD). Please clarify if the code should be used when reporting Cervical Cancer Screening for MY 2024.

Yes, as described in the Required exclusions section of the CCS measure, use LOINC code 76689-9 to exclude members with a sex assigned at birth of male any time in the patient’s history. The code was mistakenly removed from the CCS measure in the 4-1-2024 release of the VSD (Direct Reference Code spreadsheet). Because the information needed for reporting is in the measure specification NCQA does not intend to reissue the VSD.

HEDIS 2024

5.15.2024 Direct Reference Codes Why are some codes included in the measure specification and not included in a value set?

When only a single code exists for a service or condition, it is included directly in the measure specification, and referred to as a Direct Reference Code (DRC). It is a best practice to not create value sets that include only a single code; some code systems prohibit this because it results in assigning another code (an OID) to a concept that already has a code.
DRCs are listed in the measure specifications and in a Direct Reference Codes spreadsheet in the value set directory.
For MY 2024, a number of single code value sets were converted to DRCs. The Summary of Changes – Value Sets spreadsheet indicates the value set was deleted. The Summary of Changes – Codes spreadsheet indicates the code was added as a DRC (filter Column A on “Direct Reference Code”).

HEDIS 2024

5.15.2024 eGFR and uACR Timing for Kidney Health Evaluation for Patients With Diabetes (KED) When does the “with service dates four days or less apart” specification apply?

The numerator criterion is an eGFR and a uACR any time during the measurement year. These separate tests may occur on different dates.
The 4-day proximity language is specific to a reporting option for uACR, where a quantitative urine albumin test and a urine creatinine test may be billed separately. In practice, the quantitative urine albumin and urine creatinine tests are performed on the same date, from the same urine sample, to produce a single ratio. The 4-day proximity language intends to account only for potential billing lags between the separate quantitative urine albumin and urine creatinine administrative codes that indicate a single uACR evaluation; it is not intended for separate samples from different dates.

HEDIS 2024

5.15.2024 Use of AI for UM Decisions May organizations use artificial intelligence to make medical necessity denial decisions or appeal decisions?

No. NCQA UM standards do not allow the use of AI to make medical necessity denial decisions, or any appeal decisions. 

If an organization uses AI in the UM process, medical necessity review requires that denial decisions be made only by an appropriate clinical professional and appeal decisions require same-or-similar specialist review, as specified in the NCQA standards.  

HP 2024

4.15.2024 SNS-E Numerator Criteria for Completed Screenings For screening indicators, which responses to screening questions meet numerator criteria?

Any coded response (i.e., any non-null response—positive or negative) on a pre-specified instrument for food, housing and transportation counts for completed screening numerators (numerators 1, 3, 5). The PRAPARE Food Insecurity Instrument question (LOINC code 93031-3) is an exception. Based on how the question is structured and responses are coded, a “No” or “None of the above” response cannot be coded and must be left null. Therefore, a null response meets criteria for this item only. 

HEDIS 2024

3.18.2024 HEDIS MY 2023 Audit Timeline Modifications Does the recent guidance issued by NCQA on HEDIS MY 2023 audit timeline modifications apply to all organizations?

No. If the medical record review retrieval and/or abstraction operations for HEDIS MY 2023 reporting of your organization were not impacted by the Change Healthcare cyberattack, then the timeline modifications do not apply to you. You must follow the HEDIS MY 2023 Audit Timeline published on NCQA.org.
Affected organizations (defined above) should work with their auditor on HEDIS MY 2023 timeline modifications. All HEDIS Compliance Audit Licensed Organizations will share this information with the relevant organizations.

 

HEDIS 2023

3.15.2024 New Consensus-Based Entity for Performance Measurement Since the National Quality Forum (NQF) is no longer the consensus-based entity for CMS, what source can we use to identify standardized measures?

Battelle replaced NQF as the consensus-based entity for CMS; the Battelle Partnership for Quality Measurement (PQM) Submission Tool and Repository Measure Database can be found here: https://p4qm.org/. Organizations may only use measures classified as “Endorsed."

MBHO 2013

3.08.2024 Are providers required to sign-off on care plans?

The request for provider sign-off stems from the ability to verify work has been reviewed by the eligible clinician, and not solely managed by another role within the organization—or externally.

An eligible provider must be able to provide evidence of their involvement in Care Management efforts. They should not be submitting care management efforts they have not directly reviewed. That said, we suggest provider’s sign-off on care plans to indicate that they have reviewed the care plans they are counting towards their CM efforts. 

If there is a systematic limitation–meaning an electronic system does not allow the provider to electronically sign-off on the care plan–an acceptable workaround would be to provide a relevant office visit note(s), a telephone communication note(s), etc. where the provider has documented that the care plan was reviewed, discussed, updated, etc. with the patient. 

Evidence provided should exemplify that the eligible clinician has had direct oversight in care management efforts for the patient. Care planning efforts may be facilitated by other parties within the practice, but the eligible clinician must be an involved participant in the care management efforts included in their CM reporting.

PCMH 2017