Menu

FAQ Directory: HEDIS

Filter Results
  • Save

    Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.

    You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.

    Save your favorite pages and receive notifications whenever they’re updated.

    You will be prompted to log in to your NCQA account.

  • Email

    Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.

    We do not share your information with third parties.

    Share this page with a friend or colleague by Email.

    We do not share your information with third parties.

  • Print

    Print this page.

    Print this page.

expand all

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation Can the plan choose to rotate a measure that failed MRR validation?

The intent of measure rotation is to reduce chart review, not be a means to select the best rate possible. However, NCQA does not specifically prohibit this approach. Please note, if the reason for failing can be seen as possibly affecting other measures in the group, the auditor may elect to review those other measures.

HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation Can auditors provide plans with the measures selected for over-read earlier than May 1? What if the plan finishes MRR earlier?

The current timeline says that the auditor selects the measures for review on May 1 and not before; however, if the auditor reviews the health plans internal timelines, and finds that the plan expects to finish MRR early, it is acceptable that the auditor send the measure list when all chart review is complete and he has received a final count of numerator hits for each hybrid measure. For example, if the plan finishes all chart chases on April 29 and provides the numerator count lists, the auditor can select the measures for validation and start the process early.

Note: If the auditor allows for an earlier MRRV timeline, the plan may have to adjust other deadlines affected by this change.

HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 General Guidelines Can Health plans collect data from charts for a supplemental database and use the results for administrative rates?

Looking at charts is one way to collect data for a supplemental database (note: this activity should be distinguished from and not include chart review activities for the hybrid measures). All data in the supplement database, regardless of how it was collected, should be treated as administrative data. With the exception of standard data sources such as EHRs and state registries, supplemental databases should not be used during chart review for the hybrid measures.

HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation For measures that are heavily or entirely reliant on MRR data (e.g., COA, ABA, WCC, CDC BPs), if an organization attempts MRR validation and fails, or is able to retrieve a only small percentage of charts, can they report an administrative rate as low as 0% (assuming no other issues are identified)?

A low administrative rate, even 0%, can be reported, if the plan wants to submit such a rate and the auditor finds no bias or other problems in the administrative process.

HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation Can an auditor substitute one member in the MRRV sample of 16 if that members chart cannot be found?

Yes, substitution for one member is acceptable only if the organization cannot collect the chart because a practitioner is unable or unwilling to release it. The auditor has two options: he can select an original sample of 17 members (16 plus 1 oversample), and use the replacement member if the organization was unable to obtain a chart for one of the first 16 members, or he can send a 17th member when he is notified that one of the original 16 charts was unobtainable.

The auditors work papers should note which members chart was refused. If possible, the auditor should get a copy of the providers refusal letter or e-mail.

HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 General Guidelines Should Medicare Advantage (MA) members who elect the hospice benefit and choose to remain enrolled in the MA plan be excluded from MA HEDIS denominators?

No, not for HEDIS 2013 reporting; however, beginning with HEDIS 2014, exclude MA members who elect the hospice benefit available through original Medicare. This change will be in the HEDIS 2014 Volume 2 specifications.

HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation If during MRR validation, a plan fails two samples, and informs the auditor they corrected the problem, what follow-up items are required to validate that the corrections were appropriate?

The auditor may use one or more methods to validate the chart error corrections. Follow-up actions should include:
· reviewing the error investigation and results
· reviewing policies and procedures to correct the error
· reviewing the corrected sample to ensure the updated numerator counts are correct and performing final hybrid rate review
· re-sampling charts for a new validation

Examples:

1. For the exclusions or data errors in the diabetes measure records, the auditor identified a pattern: she found two cases where the chart reviewer said the members did not have diabetes, but the chart showed that both members had elevated blood sugars and above average HbA1c results. One member had a PCP diagnosis of metabolic syndrome that placed him in the measure. The other member had a diagnosis of insulin resistance. The auditor required the plan to re-review all CDC exclusions and submitted charts for the remaining correct exclusions from the measure. The auditor approved reporting.
2. For the two MRRV samples, there were two errors found _ one in each sample. The auditor required the plan to do an analysis and demonstrate corrective actions.
The plan reported that one abstractor made the errors by incorrectly identifying the prior years CDC eye exams. The plan re-reviewed 100% of that abstractors hits and reversed 12 hits to misses. The plan had originally reported 100 admin hits and 200 hybrid hits for CDC eye exam. Of the 200 hybrid hits, 160 were measurement year eye exams, and 40 were negative retinopathy cases from the prior year. The auditor pulled another sample of 16, found no errors, and confirmed that the reported rate for the measure dropped from 73% to 70% as a result.
The auditor approved reporting.
3. The auditor found four errors in the first sample for AWC. He notified the plan and required them to do an analysis and demonstrate corrective actions. The plan submitted:
· the error investigation and results
· the policies and procedures that corrected the error
· a new sample of 16 that proved to have zero errors

The auditor approved reporting.

HEDIS 2013

1.16.2013 Medical Record Review Validation What happens if a plan doesnt report any measures in a group?

The auditor selects one measure from each measure group that applies to the health plan, and exclusions from the exclusions group. If the plan doesnt report any measures in a particular group, the auditor will use his discretion, based on past performance and current progress, to determine if an additional measure should be selected from a group already used.

HEDIS 2013

12.16.2012 Guidelines for Relative Resource Use Measures The table under step 9 on page 350 of the HEDIS 2013 Volume 2 should be used when assigning members to a RRU risk group. This year, the final risk score is rounded to 4 decimal places. In the table, Risk Group 1 is between 0.0000 and 0.2490. Risk Group 2 is between 0.2500 and 0.4990. To which risk group should a member be assigned whose risk score is 0.2495? The score does not fall in either group.

All the last digits of "0" in the table should be replaced with "9" for the upper score. For example, Risk Group 1 should be revised so it is between 0.0000 and 0.2499. A score of 0.2495 should be assigned to group 1.

HEDIS 2013

12.16.2012 General Guidelines Some cells in the HEDIS 2013 Pharmacy Standard Pricing Table (SPT-Pharm) include dashes (-) instead of prices. Are the dashes equivalent to $0.00?

11.16.2012 Race/Ethnicity Diversity of Membership The note below table RDM-C-1/2/3 indicates that the "Unknown" category includes only members for whom the organization has not sought direct or indirect race/ethnicity information. If an organization sought this information but could not obtain it from the member, is this included in the "Unknown" category?

Yes. The Unknown category should be used in cases when the organization did not obtain race/ethnicity information using the direct or indirect data collection method or did not receive a "Decline" response. If the plan attempted to collect the information and the member gave a "Decline" response, the member is counted in the Direct Data Collection percentages (because the plan asked about the members race/ethnicity and received a response). The plan receives credit for attempting to collect the information, even though the member refused to provide it.

HEDIS 2013

11.16.2012 Use of High-Risk Medications in the Elderly When calculating the Average Daily Dose for medications in Table DAE-C, should organizations use rounding rules before comparing the dose to the specified threshold? How should organizations calculate average daily dose for elixirs and concentrates?

Organizations should not round when calculating average daily dose. To calculate average daily dose for elixirs and concentrates multiply the volume dispensed by dose and divide by days supply.

HEDIS 2013