Yes. Adult practices can submit one of these as a custom immunization measure. Since neither of these have 2024 specifications in the eCQI Resource Center, you will need to enter the numerator/denominator definitions along with your data.
PCMH
The OMB is requiring “Middle Eastern or North African” for the race/ethnicity combination list. If you do not have “Middle Eastern or North African” as a race only option (if you are collecting race and ethnicity separately), it is ok.
We are instructing practices to work with their vendor to include the “Middle Eastern or North African” option to the combination race/ethnicity category so practices can transition to the OMB race/ethnicity combo for future collection.
PCMH
KM 09: Diversity | Added “Middle Eastern or North African” to the race/ethnicity combined category. Also, added this note, “The OMB updated the combined Race and Ethnicity categories in 2024 to include the Middle Eastern or North African population; this is reflected in the publications. If this option is not yet available, work with your vendor to ensure compliance with the OMB.” |
CC 16: Post-Hospital/ED Visit Follow-Up | Added a note, "All discharged patients should be contacted, although not every patient may require a follow-up in the primary care practice." |
AR-QI 1: Clinical Quality Measures and AR-QI 2: Resource Stewardship Measures | Added this note, “Practices should review measure data before submission, to ensure data are captured accurately and that numbers reflect practice performance and patient population.” |
AR-QI 1: CQMs | Removed three retired measures. CMS 127: Pneumococcal vaccination status for older adults; CMS 147: Influenza immunization; CMS 161: Adult major depressive disorder: Suicide risk assessment. Adult practices may submit a custom immunization measure and pediatrics practices must select CMS 117: Childhood immunization status: Combination 10. Adult practices do not need to submit a request for a custom immunization measure. |
AR-QI 1C: Chronic/Acute Clinical Quality Measure | Pediatric practices do not need to submit a request via My NCQA to request a custom measure if they were granted a custom chronic/acute measure in 2024. |
AR-QI 1: CQMs | Two new eCQM measures added. CMS 314v1: HIV Viral Suppression (chronic/acute) and CMS 1188v1: Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing for People with HIV (other preventive). |
Appendix 6: MAC Policy | Changed contact email to rpsig@ncqa.org and removed the mailing address. |
PCMH 2017
No, unless otherwise stated in the specifications, quality measures do not have thresholds that must be met.
With that said, CMS 68 is similar to KM-15 (core): Maintaining an up-to-date list of medications for more than 80% of patients. Both sets of data require the same action of updating the medication list. However, they differ in that CMS 68 is for patients age 18+ and must be captured at every visit, whereas KM-15 is for all patients at any given time. It is unlikely that there would be a large variance between CMS 68 and KM-15. NCQA requests a note be added in QPASS if CMS 68 differs greatly from KM-15's 80% requirement. This is to provide context to the Review Oversight Committee to better understand your practice and environment.
If your practice is in Annual Reporting, practices attest that they are in compliance with all core criteria and could provide evidence that they are meeting the more than 80% requirement of KM-15.
PCMH 2017
The request for provider sign-off stems from the ability to verify work has been reviewed by the eligible clinician, and not solely managed by another role within the organization—or externally.
An eligible provider must be able to provide evidence of their involvement in Care Management efforts. They should not be submitting care management efforts they have not directly reviewed. That said, we suggest provider’s sign-off on care plans to indicate that they have reviewed the care plans they are counting towards their CM efforts.
If there is a systematic limitation–meaning an electronic system does not allow the provider to electronically sign-off on the care plan–an acceptable workaround would be to provide a relevant office visit note(s), a telephone communication note(s), etc. where the provider has documented that the care plan was reviewed, discussed, updated, etc. with the patient.
Evidence provided should exemplify that the eligible clinician has had direct oversight in care management efforts for the patient. Care planning efforts may be facilitated by other parties within the practice, but the eligible clinician must be an involved participant in the care management efforts included in their CM reporting.
PCMH 2017
The expectation is that diversity data is collected from all patients in the practice. An overwhelming majority of the practice’s population should have diversity data on file. If this is not the case, the practice should annotate an implementation plan in the notes section of Q-PASS. This plan should include an expected timeline for improved performance.
Please note that diversity data should be collected directly from the patient/family/caregiver. Please refer to the Standards and Guidelines for acceptable response options for each aspect of diversity.
PCMH 2017
This means that the information is not all medical jargon. So instead of the care plan stating, “1 PO BID”, the practice may say “take one by mouth two times a day.” Instead of hardcoded complex diagnosis names and codes, write the diagnosis in common language. For example, instead of only providing the diagnosis of “dyspnea,” use “shortness of breath.”
The intent is to ensure that the patient understands his/her condition(s), goals, and plans to follow to improve their health.
PCMH 2017
The document should not simply be a hardcoded paper that auto-populates structured fields from the EHR into the document. It should contain language showing that the patient provided input and understands the plan. NCQA is not prescriptive on specific verbiage that must be in the care plan.
The intent of CM 04 is to give the patient ownership and the power to improve their health outcomes. Engaging the patient in the development of their care plan can result in greater success and adherence to treatment goals.
PCMH 2017
There has been an update to the PCMH 2023 annual reporting requirements. AR TC 1 ( Staff Involvement in Quality Improvement) and AR CC 1 ( Hospital and ED Coordination) will now require additional documentation to demonstrate practices are meeting requirements. NCQA is requesting a documented process and evidence of implementation in addition to attestation for this criteria. All practices will have the ability to upload necessary documentation in Q-PASS by the end August. Until then, your RP manager may reach out to request additional documents.
PCMH 2017
An example of expected outcome/prognosis is typically clinically based. Expected outcome/prognosis is what the expected outcome of complying with the care plan would be. You can think about it as if a patient follows all instructions of the care plan what you are expecting to happen (e.g., their A1C/BMI/stroke risk etc. will decrease). Generally, we see practices differentiate treatment outcome/prognosis as a more clinical metric, for instance lowering A1C by 2 points etc.
Treatment goals are more lifestyle choices or outcomes for the patient, such as eating more vegetables or getting enough exercise to be able to walk around the block etc.
All of these elements are incorporated into the care plan: a problem list, expected outcome/prognosis, treatment goals, medication management and a schedule to review and revise the plan, as needed.
PCMH 2017
Topic | Update Highlights |
Front Matter (Audit Section) | Added “Evidence of implementation submitted for an audit, including reporting data, must be recent to the time of the audit.” |
Front Matter | Added a section addressing conflicts with regulatory requirements. This applies to all Recognition products. |
CM 04 | Added: “Note: After-visit summaries may only be used if they contain plain language and show patient involvement in the plan’s creation.” Also added, “The care plan is written at a health literacy level accessible to the patient (i.e., does not contain medical jargon, abbreviations/acronyms or billing codes).” |
KM 09 | Removed “pronouns” and “language” in the guidance section as an example of “other aspects of health”. |
KM 09 | Added a clarification about evidence, “Practices are to submit a report that is broken down by numerator/denominator and percentages for each category. For example, Black or African American = 400/1000 (40%); Asian = 300/1000 (30%), etc." |
AC 01 | Added to the guidance: The key to this criterion is patient preference. Some examples of questions asked may include, but are not limited to: • Our practice is considering extended hours to 7PM. What day of the week would you most prefer? • Our practice offers same day appointments at 9AM each day. Does this time work for your same day needs? Yes/No with a follow-up question: If not, please identify a time that you prefer. • If scheduled telehealth visits were offered, would you use them instead of an in-person office visit? (Y/N or Likert Scale). Can follow-up with options. |
CM 11 | New criterion – Person-Driven Outcomes Approach: Monitoring and Follow-Up |
QI 01 and 02 | Clarified that beginning in 2024, standardized measures must be used and reporting through the Measures Reporting Tile in Q-PASS. |
PCMH 2017