FAQ Directory: Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH)

No. Credentialing—although important to a clinician’s ability to practice—is not a specific indicator of performance or quality information. Practices must use performance data to evaluate the quality of specialists or consultants to whom they send patients. Performance data can be qualitative or quantitative and may be gathered from external reporting sources (e.g., PCSP recognition, CMS public reporting) or may be internal based on criteria defined by the practice (e.g., evaluating a specialist’s timeliness in returning referral reports, evaluating whether patients had a positive experience). 
 

PCMH 2017

No. QI 02B focuses on actions where the practice can impact utilization and health care costs in healthcare, not at the practice level.

PCMH 2017

An informal agreement could be a few sentences in a referral form, e-mail or other method of communication containing expectations for the specialist, including, but not limited to, the time frame for reporting to the primary care physician and specifying lab or test results that should be included in the report. This information is essential to clarify the relationship between the primary care provider and specialist.
 

PCMH 2017

If the clinical summary also includes the details of the patient’s care plan (i.e., information outlined in the criterion guidance), then it would meet the requirement. A clinical summary alone that does not include the patient’s care plan information would not meet the requirement.

PCMH 2017

There is no minimum data requirement. To meet this core requirement, practices must meet all six items outlined in CC 01. Practices must consider how best to demonstrate their process for each item to meet the intent as described in the guidance section of this criterion. 

PCMH 2017

Although the care plan can be made available via the patient portal, it is essential that all patients have access to the document. If patients are not registered for the portal, they will not have access. In those cases, practices should use an alternative method to provide the written care plan to patients to ensure that all patients have access after an appointment. Please note practices must document that the care plan is provided to the patient in the patient’s medical record.
 

PCMH 2017

No. Comment sections or “free text” questions on a patient experience survey do not meet the requirement as a method of collecting qualitative feedback from patients and their families.

PCMH 2017

Yes. Practices must assess whether there are barriers to meeting goals and should address any identified barriers. Both components must be listed in the medical record in order to select “Yes” in the Record Review Workbook. If the practice assesses potential barriers and none are identified, the practice may answer “Yes.”
Note: Practices must provide an example of how they meet each criterion and complete the Record Review Workbook. Examples are not required if a practice provides a report as evidence.
 

PCMH 2017

Assessing effectiveness of improvement actions includes remeasurement to compare results over time and evaluation of what is driving change. Results may be quantitative (numerical data that demonstrate performance and can be compared to benchmarks) or qualitative (conceptual data that describe why performance is high or low), but practices must look at the goals set, actions taken to improve and previous or baseline results.

PCMH 2017

No. Practices must track important referrals, such as those made for high-risk patients.
 

PCMH 2017

NCQA does not specify a time period required for remeasurement, but it must be long enough for the practice to implement a performance improvement plan and to assess results.

PCMH 2017

The practice must demonstrate at least three examples demonstrating co-management arrangements, such as de-identified referral forms that include the arrangements or sections of the medical record specifying the clinician responsible for each component of care. For example, for a diabetic patient who is referred to a medical oncologist, the arrangement would identify which clinician manages the diabetes and which clinician manages the side-effects of the oncology treatment and their expectation for timely sharing of patient information.
 

PCMH 2017