FAQ Directory

All measures on which the organization bases action are included in the scope of a PHQ Survey, including those developed and whose results are calculated as part of a collaborative and those calculated directly by the organization.

NCQA evaluates the organizations activities in one of two ways.

1.Evaluate the collaborative onceif the collaborative opts to undergo a PHQ surveyand apply the survey results to all participants

2.Evaluate the measures, methods and processes of the collaborative when each participant organization is surveyed

The organizations scores on any element are based on the performance of both the collaborative and the organization. The organization must meet the element for all measures, including the collaborative measures it uses. For example, for Element C: Methodology, NCQA evaluates the organizations methodology for each measure directly. It may evaluate the collaboratives methodology either once during a survey of the collaborative or for each organization during the organizations survey. Regardless of the process, all measures must meet the requirements of Element C in order to meet the element.

When a collaborative undergoes a survey directly, the process is streamlined for all involved (the collaborative, the organization and NCQA). In addition, the process may be more cost-effective, since NCQAs pricing is designed to reflect economies of scale.

Yes. Factor 1 applies because patient experience results are considered measures of quality.

NCQA does not evaluate coding accuracy and quality. Element D, Verifying Accuracy requires an organization to have a process to evaluate the accuracy of its measure results. The organization may use external auditors to verify its methodology, but is not required to do so. In the future, NCQA may develop standards for auditing physician measurement and a program for certifying auditors. With such standards, NCQA will consider making external audit a requirement.

NCQA has not decided. All products are periodically evaluated and proposed changes are published for Public Comment before updates are released.

NCQA performs surveys on the PHQ standards, but may develop standards for auditing physician measurement and a program for certifying auditors. With such standards, NCQA will consider making external audit a requirement.

The cost of a PHQ Survey is based on survey and evaluation type. The current pricing table for NCQA PHQ Certification is available from the NCQA Web site at www.ncqa.org/tabid/753/Default.aspx.

No. NCQA does not evaluate an organizations code; it reviews the organizations measure specifications and compares them to the original source specification (if applicable).

Element C, Measurement Methodology requires the organization to have a method for determining measurement error and measure reliability. Element H, Principles for Use of Results sets requirements for minimum observations or levels of measure reliability or confidence intervalsas applicable for quality and cost, resource use or utilization measures.

For calculating measure reliability for PHQ, the organization must use the method described in the Explanation in Element C under the subhead Measurement error and measure reliability. Measure reliability is defined as the ratio of the variance between physicians to the variance within one physician, plus the variance between physicians.

NCQA does not prescribe the method used to calculate confidence intervals because the appropriate method may vary based on the parameter (e.g., mean or proportion).

NCQA recognizes that some NQF-endorsed or AQA-approved specifications may require additional specifications to implement in specific contexts. Organizations may supplement endorsed specifications as long as they follow all endorsed specifications and if such supplementation does not alter the intended numerator, denominator and exclusion criteria for the measure.

Element G, Request for Corrections or Changes has four factors. 1. Documentation of the substance of the request 2. Investigation of the request 3. Notification of the specific reasons for the final decision 4. Notification of the outcome prior to taking action on measure results NCQA reviews an organizations documentation to determine if it follows its process for handling physician requests for corrections or changes related to the four factors. In response to inquiries from many organizations, NCQA issued a clarification on the expectations of the process (which is scored in Element F) and the file review against that process. See the Corrections, Clarifications and Policy Changes Web page at www.ncqa.org/tabid/120/Default.aspx.

There is no minimum requirement. If the total number of files is fewer than the requested 40 files, NCQA reviews the entire file universe. For file review elements, NCQA follows its 8/30 methodology. Refer to An Explanation of the 8 and 30 File Sampling Procedure on the NCQA Web site at www.ncqa.org/tabid/125/Default.aspx.

Case-mix adjustment considers variations in the health of physicians populations, often defined by age and gender. Severity is a patients degree of illness for a specific mix of conditions (e.g., cancer stages), morbidity or comorbidity. Together, case mix and severity are often called risk. Risk can be either the risk for needing a mix of medical services (utilization and associated costs) or the patients likelihood of achieving a specific level of quality-related outcome.

Risk adjustment may not apply to quality measures, particularly process measures. For quality measures, NCQA requires the organization to demonstrate that it has considered whether to risk-adjust measuresand that it has an explicit methodology if it does and an explicit rationale if it does not. If the organization determines that case-mix and severity adjustment do not apply to a quality measure, it provides documentation that supports the determination. If the organization adjusts measures for case-mix or severity, it provides documentation describing the methodology used.